What’s the fuss about?

Collective decision to close Jalan Tanjung Bandar Utama made last month, says BUCC
Thursday, October 29th, 2009 08:25:00
Flashback
PROTESTS by residents over the impending closure of Jalan Tanjung Bandar Utama, a private road belonging to Bandar Utama City Corporation (BUCC) are unnecessary, according to BUCC.

Its general affairs manager Paul Fernandez said the move to close the road had been endorsed by Petaling
Jaya City Council, as well as by State assembly man Elizabeth Wong.

“In September, we had a meeting with residents, Wong and the local council, to address the issue. After looking at it from all sides, everyone agreed that the road should be converted to a one-way exit from Nov 20, and would be closed six months after that,” said Fernandez.

“BUCC agreed to allow one-way traffic on the road and called on the local council and Dijaya Corporation,
the developer for Tropicana, to find alternative routes.

“I don’t see why there should be protests when the matter had been agreed upon in the first place.

Representatives of the residents were present during those meetings,” said Fernandez.

He added that the issue involving the private road went back to 1993, when BUCC agreed to allow Dijaya to utilise the road on BUCC’s land as a temporary access road for Dijaya’s residential developments.

Back then, the residential area had no access road of its own and had to rely on what is now known as Jalan Tanjung Bandar Utama as a link to the main roads.

“BUCC agreed, out of goodwill, to lend that particular stretch of road to Dijaya until the Tropicana main access road was built,” Fernandez said.

“Now that it is almost ready, the road is supposed to be closed.”

Fernandez also said BUCC was only taking back what was rightfully its.

“However, the plight of the residents was also taken into consideration.

There are a few schools that are easily accessible by that road, so we decided not to close it altogether as planned initially.”

On Tuesday, Malay Mail reported that residents expressed their unwillingness to drive an extra four kilometres to access the area — a circumvention that may take up to an hour (it now takes just 15 minutes) — should BUCC close the road.

“There are many ways to access the area, not just via Jalan Tanjung Bandar Utama,” Fernandez added.

Comments

boycott BUCC and all their business activities!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Submitted by Mr.M on Wednesday, November 18th, 2009.
Agree 100%, BUCC's motive is only about money. Since the road closure I have stopped going to Centrepoint, ! Utama and the Club at Bukit Utama. I used to go to all 3 places often so BUCC tennants are losing money. If ALL residents affected by the road closure stop using BUCC outlets maybe they will reconsider and do the right thing for their neighbors. The PJ council should also close the access from the Bukit Utama Club road to Kota Damansara and close access from 1 Utama to Kota Damansara so traffic from Bandar Utama does not congest the road Im now forced to use on my regular visits to the Curve. The U Turn by the Curve underpass is now very congested.

Submitted by Anonymous on Friday, November 20th, 2009.
Close road to solve the traffic problem? or to charge higher rental for the "One tech Park" building? Any normal people will see BUCC's actual motive. This selfish act of making more profit in the expense of thouand residents and students is totally unacceptable. Hope the goverment will come out and assist the helpless people against the greedy rich corporation.

Submitted by Anonymous on Thursday, November 19th, 2009.
Mr Fernandez said the compromise involved making the road a One way (exit only) road from November 20th with a possible full closure 6 months latter. BUCC have shown their true intent by fully closing the road from Monday November 16th (close to the initially advised November 14th date). This was supposedly for road works. However the road works are minimal. The actual cause of the closure is a structure more like the "Berlin wall" complete with razor wire and manned by a Khaki clad private security army. Maybe BUCC are expecting a riot the very residents that "agreed upon it in the first place". This issue is passionately discussed in this area. A petition is being circulated to get the PJ council to re-open the road. the issue deserves a more balanced coverage from your paper. Mr Fernandez views were very much his own opinion and - I believe- at odds with many of the residents. He should be challenged on his claims that the road closure is supported by the residents. Elizabeth Wong should also be interviewed so her opinion and that of the PJ council is 'on the record'. For many residents, the councils handling of this issue may be a factor at election time.

Submitted by Anonymous on Wednesday, November 18th, 2009.
I agree traffic in BUCC is bad - as it is throughout KL and PJ. I think the solution is to stop more development, not close roads. If we create parks and greenspace not more condo's and houselots we wont need more roads. This will increase the value of homes in the area and solve the traffic problems. If BUCC wants less congestion in the BUCC area they should close off the roads from Kota Damansara. Maybe the Curve and Tropicana should close those roads making less traffic for residents of those areas. In the meantime I wont be shopping at Centrepoint or 1 Utama so thats one less car to worry about.

Submitted by Anonymous on Wednesday, November 18th, 2009.
As a bandar utama resident I very happy on the decision to close the road. I give praise to the government officials and our representive on their hard work and knowledge in this matters. Looking at the senario we bandar utama residence are facing, BUCC wisely decided to take action. Looking at future, ongoing and present development we residence of Bandar utama do need more traffic to enter into our area. When ara Damansara (subang) gets their link road to tropicana, bandar utama traffic will be overwhelms. What BUCC is doing is to let other developer to build their on road and access their on development area, instead of building and building high density areas without much thaught of outlets or inlets into the area. BUCC takes care of their residences, that not much to say about other developers.

Submitted by Anonymous on Friday, November 6th, 2009.
Put a side all selfish thinking, take the interest of the residents and students in making decission. Will closing Jalan Tanjung Utama solve the traffic problem or just shifting the issue to another areas? BUCC please show your social responsibilities and become corporate citizen.

Submitted by Anonymous on Saturday, November 7th, 2009.
Why can't all this complainers get into their thick skull. The road belong to Bandar Utama. BUCC have the right to close it. BUCC has already open persianran bandar utama road (from one club to kub) and yet they still complain. Hurry for Petaling Jaya City Council, as well as by State assembly man Elizabeth Wong, will definitely vote for them in their next elections. So will Thousand of residents in Bandar utama.

Submitted by Anonymous on Friday, November 6th, 2009.
By aguing the land owned by the developer and they can do whatever they want withot considerng the public interest is morally and ethically unacceptabel! To resolve the traffic problem by shifting it to another areas is a selfish act. If by closing Jalan Tanjun Utama, the traffic starts to build up at BU11/12 areas, will the developer close another road? Based on BUCC track record, there is highly likely that they will do it. All parties involved should sit down to discuss and look for solution that in the public interest. Any action should take into thousand of residents and thousand students in the areas.

Submitted by Anonymous on Saturday, November 7th, 2009.
I cannot see how delaying the closure of the road for 6 months solves the problem. The fact that both the State Assembly man and the Petaling Jaya Council both endorse the closure of the road is simply another example of politicians representing the interests of big money not the interests of the public which votes for them. Hopefully the residents involved remember this at election time and use their votes to express the displeasure in their elected representatives. I also suggest the residents affected by this closure show their displeasure at BUCC and boycott all businesses associated with them. The loss of business at Centrepoint, 1 Utama etc etc may make BUCC realise the impact this has on residents in the area. 20,000+ people not visiting these businesses will have a definite impact. Given we cannot easily drive to either of these shopping centres supporting the Curve wont be hard. If BUCC and the PJ Council really want to reduce traffic congestion maybe they should stop BUCC doing any further development in this area. Fewer residents and fewer business would mean fewer road users. We purchased property in this area 5 years ago. The easy access was advertised as a major benefit. No mention was made of "private roads" and impending road closures. In most countries allowing unrestricted public access over a property for a number of years creates a Public Right of Way under "common law". I am surprised this is not the case in Malaysia. I hope the politicians do the right thing and compulsorily purchase the road land as the law permits them to do. If they do not maybe the people need to show both the Politicians and BUCC our displeasure by spending our money elsewhere and voting for other politicians who represent the all the people not just those with the money.

Submitted by Mohd on Tuesday, November 3rd, 2009.
Hi Mohd, i fully agreed with you. Resident of Laman lmpain/Sunway Damansara

Submitted by Anonymous on Thursday, November 12th, 2009.
All the developers having projects around the vicinity had failed to highlight to buyers of their properties that this stretch of road belongs to BUCC and that they are using it at the pleasure of BUCC. Now that BUCC has decided to claim what is rightfully theirs, the developers having projects in the vicinity particularly Dijaya Corporation should meet BUCC and MBPJ to arrive at a solution and not allow the public to suffer. I hope all the relevant parties involved could come up with a win win solution and that MBPJ should stop approving any high density projects in the areas so as not to aggravate the traffic congestion in the area further. BUCC is at fault as they have not in the first instant put up signboard to inform the public that they are using private road and that the road may be closed in future.

Submitted by WT Ong on Sunday, November 1st, 2009.
This is a repeated selfish act by the same developer who closed off the direct exit from Bandar Utama to Damansara toll/ NKVE back in 2006 diverting traffic to make a U-Turn on the already congested Jln Damansara. The current road closure may slightly ease traffic in BU alone BUT cause inconvenience to the local residents/ community and the diversion of traffic will further congest other neighbouring residential areas and public roads. With public roads and accessibility to public schools greatly impacted, on what basis did the City Council approve the closure? It will be total havoc for traffic at SJK (C) Damansara, again another U-Turn required. Most developers promote inter-connectivity and accessibility in residential developments but BUCC is simply selfish. Imagine if all developers practice the same by cutting off inter-connectivity, what will happen to traffic flows? Where is the CSR?

Submitted by Anonymous on Saturday, October 31st, 2009.
BUCC has ignored the pleads of thousands of students and residents! Their action has caused their reputation and exposed that corporate responsibility is totally not in BUCC's culture. Hope residents can join up to oppose this move and our honourable people representatives will assist the normal people against the suppression by big corporation.

Submitted by Anonymous on Friday, October 30th, 2009.
Syndicate content

Disclaimer | Contact Us | Back to Top Δ

Contact our advertising team to place an advertisement in Malay Mail, Malay Mail Online, and Mail on Sunday.

Copyright 2009 Malay Mail Sdn. Bhd.